History and HBD have exposed flaws in the plan of separation of powers adopted by the Founding Fathers of the United States. This morning, I meditated on how their errors might be corrected. I sought a synthesis of Jim, Moldbug, r/K, Vikings, Sparta, Beard, anthroplogy, and Glubb. Here is the result.
The basic unit of government is the blooded patriarch. For women, children and aliens, nothing, so far as the constitution is concerned.
The next unit is the tribe, composed of between 6 and 100 souls, and at least one blooded. This limit reflects the Dunbar number.
The next unit is the moot, composed of one representative per tribe. Voting weight of representatives is by number of blooded represented.
Moots govern war power, violent crime laws, social regulations, sumptuary laws, and can impeach for treason.
Moots stack iteratively. The target size of each assembly is the dunbar number, 6-100.
Paralell to the moot is the senate, which governs economic policy: tariffs, land tax, eminent domain, appropriations and spending. It is structured like the moot, except that voting weight is by taxes paid in gold over the last decade. It can impeach for socialist/progressive/keynesian economics, debasing of currency, etc.
Judges are selected from the blooded by % memorized of King James Bible. This is to resist ideological mutation. For every moot and senate, a judge. Judges serve for life unless impeached.
That leaves the executive. It seems to me that the needs of this office, at various levels from local to national, mutate over time and with changing circumstance. Thus I propose that the senate and moot at each level appoint and recall executives as they see fit, to enforce their separate powers and decrees.
At the level of the one-family tribe containing one blooded patriarch, the patriarch becomes the executive, judicial and legislature powers. No interference with the internal affairs of his tribe is permitted. As the fractal zooms out, these powers separate in accordance with human nature and the demands of modernity.
Lastly, amendments to the constitution. The American model was insufficiently conservative. I propose that modifications to the constitution must be ratified by both a 3/5′s majority of moot and senate, and by a 3/5 majority of judges with > 10 years tenure in office.